Today the OECD released the key document, approved by the Inclusive Framework on BEPS, which will form the basis of the peer review of the Action 6 minimum standard on preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances.
May 29, 2017 at 09:58PM
To preface this, I am a high schooler who has been programming for about 4 years, I like to think I’m a competent programmer, so I probably won’t say something glaringly wrong, but if I do lmk so I can learn something new.
So I’m writing a chess AI and I’m using minimax and alpha-beta pruning (if there are other cool algorithms you can think of please also mention them in the comments :P) and I was thinking of other ways I could optimize the computer and I kinda realized that the ai wasn’t going to play a computer who can think 10 moves ahead, but rather a casual player who can think maybe 3-4 moves ahead. So why should the computer assume the opponent is always going to make the move that will minimize their loss several moves ahead when they will probably only think a few ahead? If the program assumes the human can only think 5 moves ahead (and even this is just to be safe, because really a person who thinks that far ahead and isn’t like a grandmaster would be scary) it can make moves that would maximize gain even more.
submitted by /u/Ludwig0
May 29, 2017 at 09:48PM
SHENZHEN, China, May 29, 2017 /PRNewswire/ — 500.com Limited (NYSE: WBAI) (“500.com” or the “Company”), a leading online sports lottery service provider in China, today announced that it entered into a share purchase agreement (“Share Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which it has…
May 29, 2017 at 09:18PM